Joe, Mary, and the Party of "NO"

Let’s take a look at the politics of the federal health care debate:


Big Joe the Stud and little Mary Cheerleader are on their first date. Joe decides they are going to have wild passionate sex so he asks Mary if she prefers the backseat or outside on a blanket. “Whoa” says Mary, “We are NOT going to have sex!”

That’s when Joe found out that Mary was the party of “No”; did not support bi-partisan solutions; had no realistic counter proposals on how they were to have sex; and was no more than an obstructionist.

Just like the federal health care debate, the one with no dog in the hunt beyond getting the benefits are all in favor of the plan they proposed, while the one who is paying the price is offered only the prospect of getting raped.

That’s why we arm our daughters and teach them how to shoot; and THAT is why we have the 2nd Amendment.


The proposed presidential health care summit is to discuss implementation of a proposal that violates the limits of authority of the federal government.  The president may think that this is "fundamentally transforming  the USA", but according to the COTUS, usurping powers not delegated constitutes treason.